In addition to these technical options, sediment management itself, i.e. the decision as to where which dredged material is transported, has a significant impact on the carbon footprint. Our primary goal is to reduce the amount of dredging, because the less dredging is required, the less climate-impacting fuel is consumed. In addition to the amount of dredging, the distance between the dredging site (i.e. the port) and the transportation points is also crucial. The shorter the distances, the lower the emissions.
<p
<p>However, if the dredger does not take the sediments far enough towards the North Sea, for example only to the transfer point near the Elbe island of Neßsand, a large proportion will be washed back into the port with the strong tidal current and will soon have to be dredged again. This creates a dredging cycle, which in turn results in higher emissions. The aim of our sediment management is therefore to minimize these dredging cycles without having to cover unnecessarily long transport distances. Dumping sites in the Elbe estuary are ideal in this respect.</p
<p>However, many other conditions must also be taken into account when choosing the optimal transfer point, such as nature and environmental protection and shipping safety. However, calculations show that a sufficient discharge of sediments over the years can lead to significantly lower dredging volumes overall and therefore also to considerable savings in climate-impacting emissions. We are therefore working on developing sufficient dredging options from which the sediments are not returned to the port. This is another way in which we are contributing to climate protection.