In addition to these technical options, sediment management itself, i.e. the decision as to where which dredged material is relocated, has a significant influence on the carbon footprint. Our primary goal is to reduce the amount of dredging, because the less dredging is required, the less climate-impacting fuel is consumed. In addition to the dredging volume, the distance between the dredging site (i.e. the harbour) and the relocation sites is also crucial. The shorter the journey, the lower the emissions.
However, if the dredger does not take the sediment far enough towards the North Sea, for example only to the relocation site near the Elbe island of Neßsand, a large part of it is washed back into the harbour by the strong tidal current and has to be dredged again. This creates a dredging cycle, which in turn results in higher emissions overall. The aim of our sediment management is therefore to minimise these dredging cycles without having to cover unnecessarily long transport distances. Relocation sites in the Elbe estuary are ideal in this respect.
However, many other boundary conditions must also be taken into account when choosing the optimal relocation site, such as nature and environmental protection and shipping safety. However, calculations show that a sufficient discharge of sediments over the years can lead to significantly lower dredging volumes overall and therefore also to considerable savings in climate-impacting emissions. We are therefore working on developing sufficient dredging options from which the sediments are not returned to the harbour. This is another way we are contributing to climate protection.